%0 journal article
%@ 0079-6425
%A Zerbst, U., Bruno, G., Buffiere, Y., Wegener, T., Wu, T., Zhang, X., Kashaev, N., Meneghetti, G., Hrabe, N., Madia, M., Werner, T., Hilgenberg, K., Koukolíková, M., Procházka, R., Džugan, J., Möller, B., Beretta, S., Evans, A., Wagener, R., Schnabel, K.

%D 2021
%J Progress in Materials Science

%P 100786 
%R doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786
%T Damage tolerant design of additively manufactured metallic components subjected to cyclic loading: State of the art and challenges
%U https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786
 
%X We see that many of the classic concepts need to be expanded in order to fit with the particular microstructure (grain size and shape, crystal texture) and defect distribution (spatial arrangement, size, shape, amount) present in AM (in particular laser powder bed fusion). For instance, 3D characterization of defects becomes essential, since the defect shapes in AM are diverse and impact the fatigue life in a different way than in the case of conventionally produced components. Such new concepts have immediate consequence on the way one should tackle the determination of the fatigue life of AM parts; for instance, since a classification of defects and a quantification of the tolerable shapes and sizes is still missing, a new strategy must be defined, whereby theoretical calculations (e.g. FEM) allow determining the maximum tolerable defect size, and non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are required to detect whether such defects are indeed present in the component. Such examples show how component design, damage and failure criteria, and characterization (and/or NDT) become for AM parts fully interlinked. We conclude that the homogenization of these fields represents the current challenge for the engineer and the materials scientist.