@misc{monbaliu_risk_assessment_2014, 
author={Monbaliu, J., Chen, Z., Felts, D., Ge, J., Hissel, F., Kappenberg, J., Narayan, S., Nicholls, R.J., Ohle, N., Schuster, D., Sothmann, J., Willems, P.},
title={Risk assessment of estuaries under climate change: Lessons from Western Europe},
year={2014},
howpublished = {journal article},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.01.001},
abstract = {The traditional SPR approach with a consecutive treatment of the flood, pathway and receptor is well understood and is widely used in coastal flood risk analysis. Here an enhanced 2D conceptual version of the SPR method is used to better describe the system and to allow flexibility in considering multiple scales, flood sources and pathways. The new approach is demonstrated by three estuarine case studies in western Europe: the Gironde estuary, France; the Dendermonde region in the Scheldt estuary, Belgium; and HafenCity (Hamburg) in the Elbe estuary, Germany. They differ considerably in the surface area considered, in the type of flood sources, and hence also in the SPR configuration. After a brief introduction of the typical characteristics of the three study sites including some lessons learned from past flood protection measures, the differences in application and results of the SPR approach are discussed. Emphasis is on the specific aspects for each study site, but embedded in a generic SPR framework. The resulting generic lessons learned about the flood sources and how this shapes subsequent analysis are transferable to numerous important estuaries worldwide.},
note = {Online available at: \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.01.001} (DOI). Monbaliu, J.; Chen, Z.; Felts, D.; Ge, J.; Hissel, F.; Kappenberg, J.; Narayan, S.; Nicholls, R.; Ohle, N.; Schuster, D.; Sothmann, J.; Willems, P.: Risk assessment of estuaries under climate change: Lessons from Western Europe. Coastal Engineering. 2014. vol. 87, 32-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.01.001}}