%0 journal article
%@ 1748-9326
%A Cremades, R.,Rothausen, S.G.S.A.,Conway, D.,Zou, X.,Wang, J.,Li, Y.

%D 2016
%J Environmental Research Letters
%N 
%P 054007 
%R doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007
%T Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs in the Water–Energy Nexus of Irrigation Modernization in China
%U https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007
 
%X There are strong interdependencies between water use in agriculture and energy consumption aswater,saving technologies can require increased pumping and pressurizing.The ChineseGovernment includes,water efficiency improvement and carbon intensity reduction targets in the 12th Five-Year Plan (5YP.,2011–2015), yet the links between energy use and irrigation modernization are not always addressed in,policy targets. Here we build an originalmodel of the energy embedded inwater pumping for irrigated,agriculture and its related processes. Themodel is based on the physical processes of irrigation schemes and,the implication of technological developments, comprising all processes from extraction and conveyance,of water to its application in the field. Themodel uses data from government sources to assess policy targets,for deployment of irrigation technologies, which aim to reduce water application and contribute to,adaptation of Chinese agriculture to climate change.The consequences of policy targets involve cobeneficial,outcomes that achievewater and energy savings, or trade-offs inwhich reducedwater application,leads to increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.Weanalyze irrigation efficiency and energy use in,four significant provinces and nationally, using scenarios based on the targets of the 12th 5YP.At the,national scale,we find that expansion of sprinklers and micro-irrigation as outlined in the 5YP would,increaseGHGemissions from agricultural water use, however, emissions decrease in those provinces with,predominant groundwater use and planned expansion of low-pressure pipes.Weshow that themost costly,technologies relate to trade-offs, while co-benefits are generally achieved with less expensive technologies.,The investment cost per area of irrigation technology expansion does not greatly affect the outcomein,terms ofwater, but in terms of energy the most expensive technologies aremore energy-intensive and,producemore emissions.The results show thatwater supply configuration (proportion of surface to,groundwater) largely determines the potential energy savings from reductions in water application. The,paper examines the importance of fertigation and highlights briefly somepolicy implications.